Contemporary issues in the government and administration of Latin American megacities
By: WARD, Peter M
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: São Paulo : FGV, Jul./Ago./Set.1996Subject(s): Governabilidade | Governança | Administração | DemocraciaOnline resources: Acesso RAE Revista de Administração de Empresas 36, 3, p. 42-53Abstract: This paper is the first to systematically analyze and compare the structures of city governance and administration for seven major cities in Latin America, four of which are megacities (population of over 10 million and three others are large national capitals. U.S. and U. K. models of city administration are reviewed as base/me models against which differences in Latin American may be explored. Structures of Government in Latin America show several important features and trends: 1) the lack of metropolitan (cross jurisdictional) authority; 2) the existence of strong mayors and weak councils; 3) high levels of partisanship; 4) overlapping rather than interlocking bureaucracies; 5) pressures towards the privatization of city services, but continuing tension over the desirability of public versus private control; 6) greater fiscal responsibility and autonomy; and 7) a continuing marginaIization of public participation in megacity governance. In spite of these features, many cities throughout the region (regardless of whether they are megacity size or national capitals), are actively intensifying their efforts to develop more effective, accountable and democratic governance structures
This paper is the first to systematically analyze and compare the structures of city governance and administration for seven major cities in Latin America, four of which are megacities (population of over 10 million and three others are large national capitals. U.S. and U. K. models of city administration are reviewed as base/me models against which differences in Latin American may be explored. Structures of Government in Latin America show several important features and trends: 1) the lack of metropolitan (cross jurisdictional) authority; 2) the existence of strong mayors and weak councils; 3) high levels of partisanship; 4) overlapping rather than interlocking bureaucracies; 5) pressures towards the privatization of city services, but continuing tension over the desirability of public versus private control; 6) greater fiscal responsibility and autonomy; and 7) a continuing marginaIization of public participation in megacity governance. In spite of these features, many cities throughout the region (regardless of whether they are megacity size or national capitals), are actively intensifying their efforts to develop more effective, accountable and democratic governance structures
RAE Juho Agosto Setembro 1996
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.